to do, not to define
6/22/2010 09:07:00 PMHaving been poured by questions these days :
why do people finally decide to get married?
when somebody can just live alone ,what is married supposed to do with their lives?
to not be alone in entire life? to be taken care about? what an ego!
how do people define love, anyway?
how do people know it's love, not any deceiving feeling?
how do people believe they've found the difference between mere physical attraction and love-chemistry?
why don't people think it's only an ego to own, to always be with, to always be understood?
how do people know which love is the right one, which love is the normal one?
what about those homosexual people? are they guilty for their orientation? isn't it said to love for who people are, not for what they are?
why do people have sex to prove love? is love can only be proven with such thing?
why what which why how whom who what what what %(^#!%!@?>
yes.
i did complicate.
i did notice it.
and i did, i really thought that was the answer why i'm single : i prefer to complicate simple thing.
then something tickled my mind in sudden;
i believe to love is pretty simple:
once you believe you're in love, keep on believing in that pleasing feeling.
doesn't matter if you've been so wrong defining the feeling. love is more like a subjective abstract-thing.
keep trying to find the right definition is such a vain.
to love is just to love. no questions. just love.
and for now on,
i finally can decide what kind of guy i should spend my whole life with one day :
a guy who could define love just like the way i do,
to fall into each other for who they are, not what they are.
lol yea it ain't easy, but at least it's clear now.
i'm tired with those people who keep thinking they're in love but all they do are only question, ask, force, blah blah.
*
no, this post has nothing to do personally. it's just such another random contemplation. i don't think i'm in love. now.
why do people finally decide to get married?
when somebody can just live alone ,what is married supposed to do with their lives?
to not be alone in entire life? to be taken care about? what an ego!
how do people define love, anyway?
how do people know it's love, not any deceiving feeling?
how do people believe they've found the difference between mere physical attraction and love-chemistry?
why don't people think it's only an ego to own, to always be with, to always be understood?
how do people know which love is the right one, which love is the normal one?
what about those homosexual people? are they guilty for their orientation? isn't it said to love for who people are, not for what they are?
why do people have sex to prove love? is love can only be proven with such thing?
why what which why how whom who what what what %(^#!%!@?>
yes.
i did complicate.
i did notice it.
and i did, i really thought that was the answer why i'm single : i prefer to complicate simple thing.
then something tickled my mind in sudden;
i believe to love is pretty simple:
once you believe you're in love, keep on believing in that pleasing feeling.
doesn't matter if you've been so wrong defining the feeling. love is more like a subjective abstract-thing.
keep trying to find the right definition is such a vain.
to love is just to love. no questions. just love.
and for now on,
i finally can decide what kind of guy i should spend my whole life with one day :
a guy who could define love just like the way i do,
to fall into each other for who they are, not what they are.
lol yea it ain't easy, but at least it's clear now.
i'm tired with those people who keep thinking they're in love but all they do are only question, ask, force, blah blah.
*
no, this post has nothing to do personally. it's just such another random contemplation. i don't think i'm in love. now.
0 comments